fbpx

Victory! North Carolina Ag Gag Law Struck Down By Federal Judge

Spread the love

Late last Friday a federal judge delivered a huge victory to both animal rights advocates and the animals themselves.

The “Property Protection Act that legislators passed back in 2015 has been struck down by U.S. District Court Judge Thomas D. Schroeder.

Schroeder declared that the majority of the North Carolina ag-gag law was unconstitutional in that it violated the First Amendment’s right to free speech.

This ruling can also help the many employees who have been attempting to expose slaughterhouses that have been forcing them to work during the current pandemic mostly without proper PPE gear.

 Three years prior to the Property Protection Act’s passing Mercy for Animals released and undercover investigation that revealed hidden camera footage of workers stomping, dragging and dragging turkeys at a semen collection facility owned by Butterball.

As the bill began to be debated by North Carolina legislators Animal Outlook released their own undercover video showing the alleged abuse of chickens at a Mountain Farms facility.

Workers can be seen shoving and striking birds with closed fists while they were shackled upside down heading to slaughter.

Those that supported the Property Protection Act legislation made the argument that activists should not be allowed to deceive employers as to who they are in order to sneak in hidden cameras and investigate.

“I don’t think an employee, or somebody doing deceptive things, ought to be able to go and collect evidence of whatever wrongdoing that’s out there,” said Representative Chuck McGrady, a Republican, during the House debate.

“It’s personal property, folks. It’s something that’s protected in our Constitution.”

Lawmakers crafted the measure so that it didn’t look like other states’ ag-gag bills. Instead of imposing criminal penalties, the bill allowed employers to sue employees who plant hidden cameras, make secret recordings, capture or remove documents from their workplaces, or interfere with the “possession of real property.” And it didn’t single out agriculture.

After it passed, eight organizations, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF), sued the state in federal District Court. 

The plaintiffs argued that the law squashed the constitutional rights of those trying to document and expose animal cruelty.

Schroeder initially dismissed the case in 2017, calling the plaintiffs’ fears “hypothetical.” The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed Schroeder’s initial dismissal in 2018, saying the plaintiffs had a “reasonable and well-founded fear” that the law would chill their work in North Carolina.

By the time the case landed back in Schroeder’s courtroom, it had grown larger than a skirmish over animal rights.

Twenty-two news organizations had filed a friend-of-the-court brief saying the law would stifle whistleblowers and make it harder to do investigative journalism. 

The North Carolina Farm Bureau successfully petitioned to intervene as a defendant, saying the new law gives its members “important protections.”

Schroeder’s 73-page ruling on Friday delicately dissected the law. Some provisions, he wrote, violated the First Amendment on their face. Others were unconstitutional when applied to the type of undercover work that PETA and ALDF do. 

But employers could still sue their workers for constitutionally unprotected acts, he wrote — for example, “opening a gate to let livestock out.”

State Representative John Szoka, a Republican and the bill’s primary sponsor, told FERN that he’s disappointed by the ruling. 

“I did everything I could to make sure that no one’s First Amendment rights were being restricted,” he said.

David Muraskin, an attorney with Public Justice, a nonprofit law firm representing the plaintiffs, called the ruling a “complete win” for those looking to expose abuses.

“Essentially … anyone who wants to engage in an undercover investigation of a facility should not fear [this law],” he said.

“To the extent, the function of your activity is speech, rather than stealing … you should be protected by the First Amendment.”

Muraskin noted that the ruling is timely given the COVID-19 pandemic. North Carolina’s food system has had several major outbreaks, according to a map compiled by FERN, including 570 cases at a Tyson chicken plant, 72 cases at a Smithfield Foods pork plant (the world’s largest), and 59 cases at the same Mountaire chicken plant where activists had alleged abuse in 2015.

“I think this [ruling] should alleviate a lot of fear for people who want to come forward,” Muraskin said. 

“Given everything that we know is going on in North Carolina slaughterhouses — about the risk that employees are being subject to today because of COVID-19 — I think it’s a particularly important moment to get that clear: the threat of civil sanction from warning the public about the risks you’re facing in these workplaces … you should be much less fearful of this law. The logic of his decision is that the law should not apply to you … You should not have to worry about it.”

Help Vegan News continue to get the news that matters to our community and help us move forward in these hard times.

You can help us continue creating and telling the stories of animals and activists by becoming a Patreon supporter at: https://www.patreon.com/vegannews

Or with a one time donation through:

Venmo: @VeganNews

CashApp: @VeganNews

Paypal: PayPal.Me/vegannews

Help keep Vegan News Independent by becoming our Patron!

Brandon Kirkwood

Animal Rights Activist (ARA), Vegan, Creator and editor of Vegan News, Father to an awesome cat named Boba, Youtuber

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: